India’s Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Kashmir’s Special Status


India’s highest court has supported the removal of special privileges from Jammu and Kashmir, a move initiated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government in 2019. The region, home to over 12 million people, had its autonomy reduced and was divided into two federally administered territories. The recent court ruling emphasizes the need for regional elections by September 2024 and urges the swift restoration of Jammu and Kashmir’s status as a state.

1. Background and Revocation of Article 370

In 2019, the Indian government revoked Article 370, a constitutional provision granting significant autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir. This decision was part of PM Modi’s electoral pledge and resulted in the region losing its individual constitution, separate flag, and freedom to legislate on various matters. The move was controversial, with security measures heightened during its implementation.

2. Court Ruling and Future Step

India’s apex court upheld the revocation, stating that Jammu and Kashmir didn’t possess internal sovereignty distinct from other states. The verdict also emphasized the region’s restoration as a state at the earliest. Additionally, a judge proposed the establishment of a truth and reconciliation commission to investigate human rights violations over past decades by both state and non-state entities.

3. Political Response and Kashmir’s Historical Significance

Local politicians expressed disappointment with the court’s decision, with former Chief Minister Omar Abdullah expressing his sentiments. Kashmir, historically a princely state joining India in 1947 after British rule, has been a contentious area between India and Pakistan, leading to conflicts and divided territorial control.

4. Implications and Controversies Surrounding Article 370

Critics argue that the revocation aims to alter the demographic makeup of the Muslim-majority region by allowing non-Kashmiris to acquire land. The contentious move by the government sparked petitions and legal challenges, asserting the unique relationship between Kashmir and India and claiming the abrogation violated constitutional norms.

5. Current Scenario and Ongoing Concerns

While some restrictions imposed post-revocation have eased, concerns persist regarding communication limitations and security measures in the region. The government’s assurance of conducting state elections and restoring statehood contrasts with criticisms of suppressing dissent through communication curbs.


The recent Supreme Court ruling solidifies the government’s decision to revoke Jammu and Kashmir’s special status. However, the decision continues to draw mixed reactions, reflecting the complexities and historical significance of the region within the Indian subcontinent.

Also Read:-

Leave a Reply